Guideline to Editors

  • Publication decisions

    After completion of reviewing process, Editor in Chief/Relevant Editor makes the decision based on reviewer's analysis and report, either to precede the article for publication, any major/minor changes or rejected. If a conflict of interest exists between Editor and author, then manuscript will be blind reviewed and editor will not be involved in decision making process.

  • Peer Review

    In peer review editor ensures the timely completion of review process, unbiased judgment and fair review policy. According to journal's policy Research articles are reviewed by two external reviewers. If the difference of opinion exists editor can seek for additional opinions.
    The editor will select the reviewers who have best practice in avoiding fraudulent, duplication reviewing and have remarkable expertise in their fields.

  • Fundamental errors in published work

    If an author finds any discrepancy in his/her published work, he/she must cooperate with Editor of the journal to retract the article and correct the mistake.

  • Fair Play policy

    The editor should fairly evaluate the manuscript for their rational and scientific background. Evaluation should be based on transparency and un-biasedness. Both reviewer and author have the clear understanding of the content. The editor in chief, along with publisher arrange the transparent mechanism for appeal against editorial board decision.

  • Privacy Statement

    The name, emails and contact details provided by the author will be only used for editorial purposes and will not be available for any other purpose to anyone else.

Become Editorial Board Member

Are you ready to get start?

Subscribe Newsletter for Get in Touch!



Alert! Email Already Subscribed. Try new Email Address.
Success! Subscribe Successfully.